From smartphones to satellites: Uniting crowdsourced biodiversity monitoring and Earth observation to fill the gaps in global plant trait mapping

Daniel Lusk1, Sophie Wolf2, Daria Svidzinska2, Carsten F. Dormann3, Jens Kattge4,5, Helge Bruelheide6,4, Francesco Maria Sabatini7,8, Gabriella Damasceno4,6, Álvaro Moreno Martínez9, Cyrille Violle10, Daniel Hending11, Georg J. A. Hähn7, Solana Tabeni12, Shyam Phartyal13, Fernando Gonçalves14, Holger Kreft15, Marco Schmidt16, Han Chen17,18, Behlül Güler19, Jiri Dolezal20,21, Remigiusz Pielech22, Anaclara Guido23, Ciara Dwyer24, Francesca Napoleone25, Jacob Willie26, André Luís Gasper27, Manuel J. Macía28,29, Milan Chytrý30, Jonathan Lenoir31, Dinesh Thakur20, Jürgen Dengler32, Sebastian Świerszcz33, Jan Altman34,8, Ladislav Mucina35,36, Ashish N. Nerlekar37,38, Kaoru Kakinuma39, Pravin Rawat40, Zvjezdana Stančić41, Riccardo Testolin7, Mohamed Z. Hatim42, Flávio Rodrigues43, Jürgen Homeier44, Marcia C. M. Marques45, James K. McCarthy46, M. A. El-Sheikh47, Teja Kattenborn1

31 functional traits at 1 km resolution

Sample image from dataset
Global mean plant height in meters at 1 km resolution presented in Equal Area Scalable Earth (EASE) projection.

Abstract

Plant functional traits are fundamental to ecosystem dynamics and Earth system processes, but their global characterization is limited by the availability of field surveys and trait measurements. Recent expansions in biodiversity data aggregation, including large collections of vegetation surveys, citizen science observations, and trait measurements, offer new opportunities to overcome these constraints. Here we demonstrate that combining these diverse data sources with high-resolution Earth observation data enables accurate modeling of key plant traits at up to 1 km resolution. Our approach achieves high predictive power, reaching correlations up to 0.63 (15 of 31 traits exceeding 0.50) and improved spatial transferability, effectively bridging gaps in under-sampled regions. By capturing a broad range of traits with high spatial coverage, these maps can enhance our understanding of plant community properties and ecosystem functioning globally, and can serve as useful tools in modeling global biogeochemical processes and informing worldwide conservation efforts. Ultimately, our framework highlights the power and necessity of crowdsourced biodiversity data in high-resolution plant trait modeling. We anticipate that advancements in biodiversity data collection and remote sensing capabilities will further refine global trait mapping, fostering a dynamic trait-based understanding of the biosphere.

Methodology

Vegetation occurrences from citizen science sources (CIT) and vegetation plot surveys (SCI) were matched with mean trait values by species name with trait databases. This served to produce three training data sets (CIT, SCI, and a combination of the two) used to extrapolate community-level trait values as a function of environmental and Earth observation data. Ensemble gradient-boosting was used for trait modeling.

Earth observation datasets used as predictors include: MODIS surface reflectance, SoilGrids2.0 soil properties, WorldClim Bioclimatic variables, and the Vegetation Optical Depth Climate Archive (VODCA).

Methodology image

Usage Notes

Here you can find maps of 31 plant functional traits as defined in the TRY Plant Trait Database with a resolution of 1 km and a global extent. The maps are extrapolations by ensemble models trained on ~40 million citizen science species observations from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility as well as scientific species abundances recorded in the sPlot database in combination with TRY trait data and global Earth observation datasets.

The current iteration of the trait maps includes traits sourced from plants across three major plant functional types (PFTs): shrubs, trees, and grasses. PFT-specific maps are in progress and will be available soon.

For questions, please contact Daniel Lusk (daniel.lusk [at] geosense.uni-freiburg.de).

These products have been created in the framework of the PANOPS project. More information on this project is available at:

How to Cite

To cite this dataset, please use the following BibTeX entry:

        @dataset{lusk_global_2025,
            title = {Global plant trait maps based on crowdsourced biodiversity monitoring and Earth observation - 1 km - All {PFTs}},
            url = {https://zenodo.org/records/14646322},
            doi = {10.5281/zenodo.14646322},
            abstract = {Global, high-resolution plant trait maps based on crowdsourced biodiversity monitoring and Earth observation},
            version = {1.0.0},
            publisher = {Zenodo},
            author = {Lusk, Daniel and Wolf, Sophie and Svidzinska, Daria and Kattenborn, Teja},
            urldate = {2025-03-11},
            date = {2025-03-10},
            keywords = {1-km, Citizen science, Earth observation, Functional ecology, Global maps, notion, Plant traits},
            file = {Snapshot:/home/daniel/Zotero/storage/R396Z8PR/14646322.html:text/html},
        }

1 Chair of Sensor-based Geoinformatics (geosense), University of Freiburg, Germany, 2 Remote Sensing Centre for Earth System Research, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany, 3 Department of Biometry and Environmental System Analysis, University of Freiburg, Germany, 4 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, 5 Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany, 6 Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany, 7 BIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences (BiGeA), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, 8 Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, 9 Image Signal Processing Group, Image Processing Laboratory (IPL), University of Valencia, Paterna, Spain, 10 CEFE, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France, 11 Department of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, United Kingdom, 12 Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas, CONICET, Argentina, 13 Department of Forestry, Mizoram University, Aizawl, India, 14 Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Switzerland, 15 Biodiversity, Macroecology & Biogeography, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 16 Palmengarten der Stadt Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 17 Faculty of Natural Resources Management, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada, 18 Institute for Global Change Biology, and School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 19 Biology Education, Dokuz Eylül University, Buca, Izmir, Turkey, 20 Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic, 21 Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic, 22 Institute of Botany, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland, 23 Instituto de Ecología y Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, 24 Centre for Environmental and Climate Science, Lund University, Sweden, 25 University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy, 26 Centre for Research and Conservation, Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp, Beligum, 27 Universidade Regional de Blumenau, Rua Antônio da Veiga, 140 - Itoupava Seca 89030-903 - Blumenau - SC - Brasil, 28 Departamento de Biología (Botánica), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 29 Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 30 Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, 31 UMR CNRS 7058 "Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés" (EDYSAN), Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France, 32 Institute of Natural Resource Sciences (IUNR), Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Switzerland, 33 Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Poland, 34 Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czech Republic, 35 Iluka Chair in Vegetation Science and Biogeography, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia, 36 Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Stellenbosch University, South Africa, 37 Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA, 38 Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA, 39 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea, 40 ICFRE- Himalayan Forest Research Institute, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India, 41 Faculty of Geotechnical Engineering, University of Zagreb, Croatia, 42 Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Environmental Sciences Department, Wageningen University and Research, The Netherlands, 43 Plant Ecology Laboratory (LABEV), UNEMAT, Nova Xavantina, MT, Brazil, 44 Faculty of Resource Management, HAWK University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Göttingen, Germany, 45 Departamento de Botânica, SCB, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, 46 Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand, 47 Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia